Thursday, June 11, 2009

Upper East Side rents fall

 How much does it cost to live in one of the city's poshest 'hoods?

Not as much as it used to. If you're seeking a rental near many of the city's wealthiest denizens, you'll find an assortment of deals on the Upper East Side.

"Last year, if you were looking for a studio [on the Upper East Side], you couldn't find anything for below $1,500," says Dan Marrello, a managing director for Citi Habitats.

But things are different now.

"It's really unheard of that we're seeing studios at $1,000 to $1,400 -- but we are," says Adjina Dekidjiev, rental director for Manhattan Apartments. "I've got 39 [listings for] studios under $1,400 on the Upper East Side."

Of course, mansion-lined blocks aside, the Upper East Side has always been a little cheaper for renting than much of the rest of the city.

"The Upper East Side is a very established neighborhood, with every amenity you could want or need," says Gary Malin, president of Citi Habitats. "What you're missing is the transportation factor."

That's especially true of rentals along First and Second Avenues, several long avenue-blocks away from the Lexington Avenue 4/5/6 trains. And, as other Manhattan neighborhoods have adjusted downward, so has the Upper East Side.

According to Citi Habitats' just-released May market report, the average studio on the Upper East Side rented for $1,619 -- almost $150 cheaper than the citywide average of $1,765 and more than $300 cheaper than last year's Upper East Side average. One-bedrooms rented for $2,190 -- more than $250 per month cheaper than the city average of $2,426. And a two-bedroom went for $3,029, compared to the city average of $3,444. (Three-bedrooms, however, were $719 pricier than the rest of the city, averaging $5,376.) Moreover, the vacancy rate is at 2.27 percent -- the highest in the city.

Upper East Side deals should come with the normal warning labels: The cheapest apartments are usually far east and are located in walk-up buildings that don't have particularly great amenities. Or, they're north of the 96th Street subway stop, just before the Upper East Side officially becomes East Harlem.

While most of these deals aren't on Lexington Avenue, they're not all on York Avenue, either. "I've got a studio on 89th Street between Second and Third for $1,050," says Marrello.

And big buildings aren't immune to the pressures of the market. "We have a building on York Avenue, and in that complex studios are in the $1,300 to $1,325 range," says Wayne Hattingh, a manager with SW Management, which handles several large rental buildings in the neighborhood.

Marrello is representing a building called the Hub on 101st Street, between First and Second avenues, that is paying brokers' fees and offering two months free rent. The building is new, has top-grade appliances, a doorman and landscaped roof deck. One-bedrooms are starting at $2,145 per month -- something extremely modest by luxury doorman standards.

And the Hub is hardly the only rental complex to offer such incentives -- there are eight Upper East Side buildings owned by major landlord Glenwood that are offering a month of free rent.

"Landlords are always trying to keep rent rolls high," says Marrello, "Now they're starting to advertise lower prices."

Now just might be the time for the posh seekers to pounce.

Tuesday, June 9, 2009

Light at the end of the tunnel?


THE panic in the Manhattan real estate market of the winter of 2009 lifted in the last few weeks, brokers say, as more and more buyers and sellers have found the courage and the comfort level to sign on the dotted line. A bidding war has even occasionally broken out, though at prices far below those of a year ago, and often considerably below asking price.
A Shift in Momentum?

“When we were in free fall, nobody was willing to pull the trigger,” said John B. Gomes, a broker at Core Group Marketing. “Sellers are more realistic and buyers are optimistic, and we have the lowest interest rates in a generation.”

There is considerable room for skepticism, since the number of closed sales filed with the city remains near the lowest level in many years. Prices are still down as much as 30 percent and show no signs of rising, low-ball offers remain common and some of these latest deals may never come to fruition. But brokers say the climate has definitely changed, producing sales at all price points, as some buyers, tired of looking and waiting, are seizing the moment. Suddenly, brokers say, it is exciting to be in real estate again.

Deals picked up first among studios and one-bedrooms, which benefited from a combination of lower prices, reduced interest rates and incentives for first-time buyers. Then apartments selling under $3 million began to stir. Finally, in the last few weeks, a number of significant deals have been done in the somnolent market for trophy apartments listed above $10 million, brokers say. Sales of many expensive new Manhattan condominiums remain sluggish, however.

At Brown Harris Stevens, a real estate brokerage firm, contracts were off 60 percent last fall, after the collapse of Lehman Brothers, and a steep plunge in the stock market brought deal making to a near halt. But Hall F. Willkie, the company’s president, said that as spring — the peak selling season in New York — got under way, contracts picked up sharply. Sales, off 30 percent in April from a year earlier, were off less than 10 percent in May compared with the same month in 2008.

“We are busy, very busy and the tempo is intense, and that is all great,” Mr. Willkie said.

At Halstead Property, Diane Ramirez, the company’s president, said that contract signings in May had surpassed the number of deals reached the year before. She said many of the sales were to first-timers, and to buyers who had long been priced out of the Manhattan market but were now seeing an opportunity to get in. Some buyers who have lost out on previous deals are showing up at open houses and making offers on the spot, she said.

Bill Kowalczuk, a broker with the Corcoran Group, says that what has changed is that buyers are “willing to step up to the plate” and when they do, “sellers are listening.”

Mr. Kowalczuk has been trying for 17 months to sell a four-story town house, in need of considerable work, on West 21st Street in Chelsea near Ninth Avenue. By January he had cut the asking price by more than 25 percent to just under $4.8 million. A few weeks ago, he said, three buyers made serious offers.

A deal was almost immediately struck with one couple. But after a bank reneged on a previously approved mortgage, they backed out. Mr. Kowalczuk quickly went to contract with a second buyer, who was planning to finance the purchase by taking out a home equity loan on property in London. The final price was below $4 million.

The rise in activity does not mean that the local real estate recession is over. Prices remain sharply lower than they were a year ago, by about 30 percent, and are likely to continue to drift downward over many months, or even years, until the local economy, heavily dependent on Wall Street profits, picks up.

There is also some debate about whether the bump up in activity, which many brokers say has kept them busy showing apartments seven days a week, represents a predictable seasonal uptick, or a shift in market psychology.

Actual closings filed with the city’s Department of Finance are sparse, but these often lag behind the market, because closings can occur months after a deal is struck, especially when co-op or condominium boards have a right to review contracts.
A Shift in Momentum?

As of the end of May, the overall number of apartments closing in the second quarter was off 55 percent from the same period a year earlier, though up slightly from the first quarter. Co-op closings rose significantly from the first quarter, while condo closings fell as the backlog of contracts signed in new buildings many months ago began to shrink.

Both average and median apartment prices are off roughly 15 percent so far in the second quarter, compared with same period a year ago, with the median at $812,000, the lowest level in more than two years, according to a tabulation of city property filings.

Jonathan Miller, an appraiser at Miller Samuel who prepares market reports for Prudential Douglas Elliman, confirmed that inventory levels began to fall this spring as sales picked up. But he questioned how significant the trend would turn out to be.

“You did see an upturn in activity this time of year,” he said, but “it was not a robust spring.” Mr. Miller said that the spring did not “undo the damage that occurred last fall” during the banking crisis, and that prices still appeared to be slipping, though at a slower pace than earlier in the year.

Mr. Miller says he is particularly worried about new developments that have not cut prices as much as many individual sellers have. Mortgages can be difficult to come by in these buildings, making it harder for buyers to complete deals.

Kirk Henckels, a Stribling broker who prepares a report on the luxury market, doesn’t foresee a rise in prices anytime soon. He said he thought they might fall a bit further; he also feels that prices are in the process of stabilizing amid a burst of deal making.

Last July, Mr. Henckels listed an 18-foot-wide town house at 136 East 80th Street near Lexington Avenue for nearly $12 million. By February the price of the town house, owned by Thomas Flexner, a former vice chairman of Bear Stearns, had been cut by 25 percent, to $8.95 million. After languishing over a slow winter, it went into contract at the end of May.

Mr. Henckels said that over the winter, buyers felt they were in a “deflationary market” and had no reason to buy, since prices would most likely keep falling. With prices now off 30 percent, buyers feel the damage has been done and are tired of looking, he said.

“It’s rather remarkable,” he said. “I did five to six deals in the last two weeks at all price ranges.”

John Burger, a broker with Brown Harris Stevens who just sold a $12 million apartment at One Beacon Court on 58th Street near Third Avenue, attributes the market uptick to the rebound in the stock market since March.

“The stock market has always been a barometer for the health of the Manhattan real estate market,” he said. “Buyers are encouraged by the rebound on Wall Street. It has given people a sense of security to stop and make deals.”

Many of these trends can be seen in the battle over a one-bedroom apartment on the second floor of the Grand Madison at 225 Fifth Avenue and 27th Street. A former showroom building for the gift industry, it was converted to condominiums a few years ago.

The apartment has 11-foot ceilings, a stylish kitchen and a home office, and at 1,200 square feet, is unusually large for a one-bedroom. But it has limited views, facing the Museum of Sex rather than Madison Square Park. Two years ago, in a rising market, an investor paid $1.35 million for it, $1.2 million of which was borrowed money.

When the rental market soured, the seller came under pressure to pay the mortgage, and Jaylin Ramer, a broker at Bond New York, listed the unit in March for $1.15 million, 15 percent below the original purchase price.

Along came Luke Sager, a recent Harvard graduate and co-captain of the college soccer team, looking for his first apartment in New York. Working with Emily Beare of Core Group Marketing, he methodically studied the market, visiting 50 apartments over three months, she said. Love struck when he saw the apartment at the Grand Madison.
A Shift in Momentum?

But Ms. Ramer was listing the apartment as a “short-sale opportunity,” and other buyers were interested. An offer of $1 million in March was turned down cold, but as time went by the seller decided to be more flexible. Then, during a single week in May, three separate offers came in: one for $825,000; a second, Mr. Sager’s, for $850,000, half in cash; and a third for $900,000.

Mr. Sager countered with a $925,000 bid, all in cash, and to circumvent any more bargaining, insisted that the contract be signed the same day.

And so it was, but now Mr. Sager is waiting for the seller to complete his negotiations with the bank.

Ms. Ramer said that she and her colleagues had been involved in three bidding wars in the last week and that their negotiated deals were running ahead of those a year ago. She said she was working with several buyers who had been waiting, sometimes for years, for prices to come down.

“A lot of people I know couldn’t afford to live in Manhattan a year ago, not even close,” she said. “The people who were waiting on the sidelines are now out, and they are having great values and they are now buying.”

Dolly Lenz, a broker at Prudential Douglas Elliman, said she had several first-time apartment buyers about to sign contracts. These buyers had not been priced out — they currently live in luxury buildings on the Upper East Side, paying rents of around $8,000 a month. But drawn by the prospect of deals, they are willing to spend up to $8 million or more.
“You don’t think of these people as first-time buyers, when they have an oceanfront house in Quogue,” she said. “But this guy has always rented in New York.”

Brokers pay more attention to needy first-time buyers

Largely ignored during the boom because of their relatively paltry budgets, first-time buyers have suddenly found themselves among the most highly coveted client groups for New York City's real estate brokers. With few deals to latch onto, brokers have started paying much closer attention to them and are now giving them first-class status. In this month's Q & A, brokers told The Real Deal that first-time buyers now constitute anywhere from 30 to 70 percent of all of their clients. That's a jump from 15 to 50 percent from before the credit crunch. While these first-time buyers require far more handholding than those who are on their second or third apartment purchases, they are pulling the trigger in greater numbers. But, as one broker put it, they are still not "ready to get married" right away and are more demanding clients because they want to see more apartments and need tutorials on everything from property taxes to the financial structure of a condo or co-op.

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

Market Report: No May Flowers for Manhattan Rentals




Rental-heavy brokerage The Real Estate Group New York has released the May edition of its Manhattan Rental Market Report (available to download here), and while rents stayed largely flat over last month, the year-to-year declines can be seen in the tables above. TREGNY also cites increased demand over the past month as a sign that the typically hot Manhattan spring/summer rental season will have life this year. Graduates should check out non-doorman buildings on the Upper East Side, where rents are at a 13-month low.

While the report doesn't factor in landlord incentives that drive rents down even lower, the May '07 to May '09 head-to-head neighborhood comparisons that TREGNY includes will still open some eyes to the state of the rental market. Neighborhoods such as Murray Hill, Midtown East and the East Village have seen some approx. 20% drops in certain categories over the past two years. Getting back to the here and now, below is a neighborhood snapshot of May rents:


FORMER CORCORAN SUNSHINE SALES DIRECTOR SUES BROKERAGE


alternate text
Former Corcoran sales director suing for commissions from Five Franklin, the Avery and Linden78

A former sales director for Corcoran Sunshine Marketing Group says she has been stiffed for more than a quarter million dollars in residential brokerage commissions for sales in high-profile developments including Five Franklin, the Avery and Linden78, a court filing says.

Broker Nancy Reese accuses Corcoran Sunshine and other Corcoran entities of withholding at least $200,000 in commissions on closed sales and says the developer of Linden78 owes her $70,000 in commissions on canceled contracts, the court papers say.  

The lawsuit was filed at a time when experts believe more contracts will be canceled as the condominium market continues to deteriorate. But real estate lawyers said most contracts between brokerages and developers include clauses that state that commissions are not due until the title is passed to the buyer, so brokers are generally not paid when a contract is canceled, attorney Adam Leitman Bailey, who was not involved in the case, said.  

Reese, who left Corcoran Sunshine Marketing Group at the end of April after working at the firm for about four years, accused the company of not paying her a total of $200,000 at Five Franklin Place, the Avery at 100 Riverside Boulevard, the Orion at 350 West 42nd Street and three other locations after the sales closed.

Reese also alleges in her lawsuit brought in New York State Supreme Court May 18 that the sponsor of the struggling development Linden78, at 230 West 78th Street, owes her $70,000 in commission fees even though the sponsor offered rescission rights to all buyers in mid-April.

The developer of the project is Urban Residential, but the lawsuit does not name that company, but instead the entities listed on the condo offering plan, including Amsterdam 78 and Metropolitan Housing Partners, with the state Attorney General's office, Reese's attorney, Debra Guzov, said.

Urban Residential did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Corcoran Sunshine declined to comment.   

With the declining economy, the number of rescinded contracts has increased, impacting projects such as Linden78 and the Jasper at 114 East 32nd Street. But experts said they do not expect to see a flood of brokers suing their firms as Reese did.

Guzov, a partner with the law firm Guzov Ofsink, said that Reese was owed the commission after she presented ready, willing and able buyers, despite a rescinded contract.

"As we set forth in the complaint the commission has been earned and it comports with the language in the contract for earning the commissions," she said.

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Gramercy Park Irving Place One Bedroom Below Market Value



East 17th Street & Irving Place One Bedroom

1 Block from Union Square!

LOCATION:
Gramercy / Union Square / Irving Place

DESCRIPTION:

Well maintained, walk-up building
Third floor unit
Kitchen including appliances and new cabinetry
Marble bathroom, new fixtures
Living room featuring an exposed brick wall
11' X 11' bedroom, can fit a queen size bed and extra furniture
Two storage closets
Northern exposure view, over looking East 17th Street
New hardwood floors
Rent stabilized unit, priced below market value
Excellent Gramercy location; near all transportation, restaurants, Irving Place, the East Village, and Union Square

TRANSPORTATION:

4,5,6,N,Q,L

LISTED RENT:
$1,683

CONTACT:
Name: Jeffrey
Phone: 610.781.8417



East 17th Street & Irving Place One Bedroom

1 Block from Union Square!

Tuesday, May 12, 2009

Board proposes stabilized rent increases

The board that oversees rents for New York City’s one million rent-stabilized apartments proposed a range of rent increases on Tuesday, disappointing tenants and their supporters, who say the recession warrants a rent freeze.

In a preliminary vote, the city’s Rent Guidelines Board proposed increases of 2 percent to 4.5 percent for one-year leases and 4 percent to 7.5 percent for two-year leases. Last year, the board approved its highest set of rent increases since 1989 — 4.5 percent on one-year leases and 8.5 percent on two-year leases. The board will hold two public hearings, on June 15 and June 17; it is to take a final vote at a meeting June 23.

Landlords have argued that the board’s rent increases in recent years have been outpaced by the rising operating costs of rent-stabilized units. Tenants and some elected officials, meanwhile, have called on the nine-member board to freeze rents for rent-stabilized units, citing rising unemployment, falling median household incomes and growing numbers of tenants in housing court facing eviction for nonpayment of rent.

“This would be an appropriate year to do that,” Wasim Lone, a tenant organizer with the nonprofit group Good Old Lower East Side, said of the rent freeze. “This is the worst recession we’ve seen since the Great Depression of the 1930s.”

A report released last month by the board’s staff found that operating costs for rent-stabilized buildings increased 4 percent from April 2008 to last month; the increase was 7.8 percent in the corresponding period in 2007-8. The report also found that the 4 percent increase was offset by decreases in fuel oil and insurance costs.

The City Council speaker, Christine C. Quinn, said in an interview that she would urge the board to impose a rent freeze, in part because of the impact of the recession on tenants as well as the report showing that operating costs had not risen significantly. “We can create some relief for tenants without creating an unfair burden for landlords,” Ms. Quinn said. “We believe even with a rent freeze, landlords would continue to make a profit. They would just make a smaller profit.”

Since the board was established in 1969, it has never approved a rent decrease or a rent freeze.

Joseph Strasburg, president of the Rent Stabilization Association, which represents thousands of owners of rent-stabilized apartments, said he was disappointed by the preliminary range of increases approved on Tuesday, adding that small property owners had been hard-hit by the economy and had struggled to pay property taxes, water and sewer bills and fuel costs. He said the group was opposed to any rent freeze.

“Ten percent of my membership may not survive by this time next year,” Mr. Strasburg said, referring to small property owners. “We discovered in early fall that they were still paying off their winter fuel bills.”

The final vote last year was a rowdy affair, marked by shouting matches between landlords and tenants, many of whom had sneaked in plastic whistles and blew them at ear-ringing volume during the proceedings. In contrast, the meeting on Tuesday at the Great Hall at Cooper Union in the East Village was sparsely attended. The audience numbered about 100, most of them tenants or tenant organizers.

The meeting gave rise to divergent views on who was suffering the most during tight economic times — tenants or landlords. Steven J. Schleider, a member of the Rent Guidelines Board who represents owners, said that 1 in 10 properties was distressed because rents did not cover expenses. Adriene L. Holder, a board member representing tenants, said the severity of the recession, including rising unemployment, called for the board to adopt no rent increase.

“People cannot shoulder these types of increases being proposed,” Ms. Holder said.

Last year, the board approved a controversial supplemental rent increase for tenants who had lived in their units for six years or more, and a range of similar increases were approved on Tuesday. Owners of buildings with those tenants have the option of charging them the approved increases, or a $20 to $45 monthly increase for one-year leases or $40 to $75 for two-year leases, whichever is greater.

Two legal aid groups, the Legal Aid Society and Legal Services NYC, sued the board over the supplemental increase last year; the case is pending.

On Tuesday, to the howls of the tenants in the audience, the board voted 6-to-3 to approve the range of proposed increases and the range of supplemental increases.

Much of the discussion between board members leading up to the vote centered on last year’s deliberations. Tenants and their supporters last year said that the supplemental increase should not have been voted on, because it was not part of the tentative range of increases the board had previously approved. The board’s chairman, Marvin Markus, said at the time that the board had authorized supplemental increases in previous years and that the board’s actions were within the law.